Adam Wasserman Site

DUE PROCESS DECISIONS


DISCLAIMER
This information is not legal advice or meant to give any guidance to your own particular circumstances. This information is provided for reference and teaching purposes only. Please do not apply these summaries to your legal concerns or challenges.

STUDENT v. ENCINITAS UNION ELEMENATRY SCHOOL DISTRICT

Significant areas of law

Failure to provide adequate supports and services during distance learning is denial of FAPE.

Read More...

STUDENT v. HERMOSA BEACH CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT

Significant areas of law

Exceptions to Statute of Limitation

Read More...

SUMMIT PUBLIC SCHOOLS-DENALI, v. PARENT

Significant areas of law

Implementation of assessment plan without parental consent, lack of clarity in IEP offer.

Read More...

STUDENT v. STOCKTON UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT

Significant areas of law

Conducting IEP team meeting in absence of parent, failure to develop appropriate goals in IEP team meeting.

Read More...

STUDENT v. CARMEL UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT

Significant areas of law

Failure to consider full continuum of placements, predetermination of placement and comparable offer of IEP.

Read More...
1 6 7 8 9 10 12